Skip to content
Insider Life UK

Tetris Didn't Triumph at This Gaming Ceremony — An Additional Classification May Address This Issue

Whenever a significant prize-giving event approaches, one notices an outcry to include fresh award types to recognize overlooked contributions and fill the hearts of enthusiasts who have specialized interests.

A fellow writer made the case advocating for terror-themed awards. It would be amazing. So would strategy board titles, this being a dedicated supporter's campaign. However, I must insist for pushing forward just as with other dedicated enthusiasts, I have a cast-iron argument for why my demand stands as crucial and important of all. This is the request: It's essential to create an award type for logic-based games.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Classifying creative works isn't exact; opinions vary greatly, and it will always start arguments resulting in unclear classifications. This explains why cinema institutions avoid this approach. However, it represents an essential concession for the industry of video games, which are so diverse it's challenging to consider them one unified medium.

To recognize the complete range of achievement in video games to gain proper attention, and for games of all stripes to compete fairly, genre categories are essential.

Existing Game Classification System

Leading game ceremonies presently include genre categories for Action, Adventure-action titles, RPG experiences, Combat games, Simulation and strategy titles, and Sports/Racing games. Together, these classifications actually cover a lot of ground, making space possible for numerous titles.

Not so for brain-teasing titles. No appropriate category exists to accommodate them. Examine these examples from outstanding current releases, all very different: the architectural riddles of one title, fast-paced pattern recognition in a different title, thought-provoking social scenarios in another game. Where could they possibly go within current classifications? Simply put, no category fits.

The Representation Problem

Many instances occur of brilliant puzzle games released every year lacking appropriate categories in entertainment awards, except when they manage to fit award groups including Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, or the extremely competitive independent game categories.

  • A renowned logic title wasn’t nominated for anything in 2014
  • Another imaginative release received no nominations that year
  • A beloved organization game was overlooked that year
  • Only a few puzzle games managed to sneak into small studio or handheld classifications

Value of Brain-Teasers

These are often modest productions, yet the craft behind logic titles is of massive significance. Iconic mobile puzzle games rank among most engaged experiences globally and have been for over a decade.

The iconic tile-matching title challenges well-known building titles for the title of most purchased experience; it’s also in the running for top gaming experience. Logic titles represent cornerstones to the art of video games, and they are in conversation across multiple categories.

Proposal and Rationale

Puzzle games wouldn’t have such difficulty. One could readily select five nominees engaging, different, qualified experiences each ceremony simply — actually, with challenge, since numerous excellent many worthy titles.

And to reiterate, these represent titles without proper classification at major gaming awards. Brain-teaser creators are working at the challenging frontier of video game design, developing some of the purest expressions of the video game form. Comparable to movie stunt professionals, they warrant appreciation. Let’s not keep them waiting decades.

Written by

Kurt Jones

A seasoned lifestyle journalist with a passion for uncovering unique stories and sharing practical advice on modern living in the UK.

Insider Life UK

Type to search articles.